Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?
In contemporary days, travelling facilities are most crucial for public. It is believed by some group of individuals management ought to invest money on railways as compared to roads. I agree with this statement to a large extent for some reasons. My view points will be discussed in ensuing paragraphs.
There are many reasons so authorities should spend money on railways. The most important is economy and environment. To illustrate, nowadays, trains is run by use of electricity. So, train engine not spread toxis gases. As a result, it is not harmfull for environment. In addition, in the recent time, most of the people prefered travel in trains. So, if ministory invest money on trains and provide more facilities. Than, more public will used trains and as a result, it is helpfull for increased national income.
Moreover, in these days, time is most important for public, however, road traffic problem, other unexpected problems are in road facilities. As compare to that, people have hectic shedule. So public need fast traveling facilities. The last reason is feeling better, if people bore during the journey, than, human beings should walk in trains and they are ought to rejuvenate themselve.
On the other hand, management should spend money on roads. The first reason is emergency facilities. In the hospitals, if doctor's need to migrate patient from one hospital to other hospital. At that time they are not able to use train facilities.
To conclude, ministry ought to invest more money on railways as compare to roads. Because, it is help to increase national income and not harmfull for environment. However, management should also invest money on road. Because of emergency.
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country Other say that these are not only reasons Why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- Some people claim that not enough of wast from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are need to make people recycle more of thair waste 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
... on trains and provide more facilities. Than, more public will used trains and as a ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...more facilities. Than, more public will used trains and as a result, it is helpfull ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: THAN_INTERJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...ter, if people bore during the journey, than, human beings should walk in trains and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ement should also invest money on road. Because of emergency.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13718411552 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76958135384 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534296028881 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.645826252 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.2916666667 106.682146367 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.5416666667 20.7667163134 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.45833333333 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 3.4128256513 440% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167852264389 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450616919341 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06496785742 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974739222794 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304867198087 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.35 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.