Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the progressive and sophisticated world where we live in, it is very important that people have satisfaction with their job. Some people believe that it is better for workers to do similar tasks all day long. At the same time, the others believe that it is better to have many different types of tasks to do. Personally, I prefer to do different types of tasks during workday. I feel this way for two important reason, which I will explore in the fallowing essay.
First of all, having different types of tasks helps people to be more productive and creative. To be more specific, working in this situation improve some part of our brain or even revive those parts that do not work in the typical situations. On the other hand, doing similar tasks all day long makes people bored with their job and they become tired after just few couple of hours. For instance, I work as a supply chain specialist in a compony, and regarding my personal experience, when I have different types of things to do it makes me use variety of approaches to do the tasks. I mean, the more tasks to do, the more problems I will be accustomed with and the more creative person I will be.
Secondly, doing different types of tasks would help you to increase your abilities and with this object, you can make more money in your career. In other words, not only it helps you to increase your abilities, but it also helps you to strengthen your resume by adding a lot of different items to it. My personal experience demonstrates this concept. Some years ago, I was searching for a job because I wanted to find one with more income. I had been an experienced person because of my first job and my self-confidence had been Increased by doing different tasks. I could find a lot of jobs with very good amount of money. This example illustrates that hadn't I done different tasks in my first job I would have not been able to find those brilliant jobs.
To sum up, I firmly believe that having many different types of tasks to do during the workday would be better for people because it helps them to be more creative and productive and it will help them to make more money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...thers believe that it is better to have many different types of tasks to do. Personally, I pre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun couple seems to be countable; consider using: 'few couples'.
Suggestion: few couples
...ir job and they become tired after just few couple of hours. For instance, I work as a sup...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 655, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...of money. This example illustrates that hadnt I done different tasks in my first job ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'did'?
Suggestion: did
.... This example illustrates that hadnt I done different tasks in my first job I would...
^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...To sum up, I firmly believe that having many different types of tasks to do during the workday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i feel, i mean, first of all, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50255102041 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50080031963 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461734693878 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6423717787 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400010805742 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138685438697 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09872023352 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257305683565 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725052211602 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.