The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the summing of minutes of three different types of phone calls which did by the UK residence from the year 1995 to 2012.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the last two features state and foreign calls and mobile had a growing trend over the times. On the other hand, the number of minutes of local fixed-line increased up to 1999 then it drifted off.
To begin with the first five consecutive years, in 1995, people utilized almost 72 billion minutes in local fixed-line to talk, while half of that minutes were used in national and international calls. In mobile calls, people spent only 3 billion minutes which was the least among the features. After that three shows a similar trend which was rising. In 1999, the differentiation between the features remain almost the same, moreover, in this years the local, national, and international and mobile call minutes reached 90, 50, 12 billion respectively.
Turning to the rest of the period, national and foreign calls and mobile continuing the previous trend and in 2001 the second types reached from 50 to 60, while rapid change was observed in the case of mobile. It grew from 12 to 45 in the last year. Local fixed-line follow the opposite trend, it climbed down gradually and in 2002 it came close to 70 billion minutes.
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Comments
Thanks for Sharing such a…
Thanks for Sharing such a nice information. Please keep posting Stuff like this
Just Airports
Churchill Cars
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which was the least among the features. After that three shows a similar trend which ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...es remain almost the same, moreover, in this years the local, national, and internat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Turning to the rest of the period, national and foreign calls and mobile co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80349344978 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47237940892 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576419213974 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4424929821 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192799247786 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766080055013 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413353221965 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124255142634 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443851432157 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.