Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, people's opinion differs as to whether Internet-based courses should be provided. While some state that this form of teaching brings several drawbacks, I do believe that this is an optimistic development.
The main reason is that online courses helping students to study more flexibly and easily. Giving the first reason, Internet-based learning allows people to study whenever and wherever they want without considering time and distance, which reinforces their self-study abilities. Learners, for instance, gaining the ability to review these lectures over again until they have a good grasp of them. Giving another reason, this teaching approach is possible for people to absorb knowledge better than the traditional one. Firstly, online course is still an interactive learning method, it is just as flexible for teachers to deliver online lessons as it was in the traditional one. Secondly, the pace of knowledge transmission is slower, resulting in better comprehension for students, especially those falling behind their studies in the days before Internet-based learning.
Providing online courses is not only a better study approach but also offers more learning opportunities for people regardless of their knowledge, age, and financial status. Firstly, those lacking financial conditions can have a chance to engage in an online class with reduced cost or even free. Taking the poor as an example, they can enroll in some courses from top-tier institutions such as Oxford, Harvard, and Cambridge. In addition, those who have distance difficulty but are willing to study abroad can pursue higher education as well. Moreover, because of the indirect exchange through e-messages, students who have difficulties with face-to-face interaction will feel less afraid to ask for or discuss lessons with their teachers and classmates.
In conclusion, offering an online class is still a topic of debate. With these aforementioned reasons, I subscribed to the view that its development could be worth expecting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | thanhtu000 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant 84
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 89
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- Some people say that public money should be used to support the work of theatre companies Others say that theatre companies should be completely self funding Discuss both these view and give your opinion 65
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, peoples opinion differs as to whether Internet-based courses should be provid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...also offers more learning opportunities for people regardless of their knowledge, a...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59090909091 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93554616214 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.498340158 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289023919719 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913874226601 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494220257358 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15903142855 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391854160673 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.