Parallel to the enhance in agricultural and industrial activities, incredible numbers of environmental problems have been caused. People are divided into their opinions regarding the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals or there are more significant environmental problems. The following essay takes a look at both sides of the argument before reaches a reasonable conclusion.
Species extinction is indeed an imperative problem. Provenly, a huge number of wild animals are being hunted to extinction for restaurants and even medicinal products. Meanwhile, most forest areas have to face with getting narrower problem because of deforestation and uncontrollable forest destruction. Consequently, unbalance in the ecosystem is appeared and natural disaster such as erosion and flood has been more dangerous gradually. For instance, the American black bears have been disappeared about 100 times faster than they used to, threatened with extinction. In addition, forest areas have been reduced considerably by half compared to the period time before agriculture got started.
Actually, there are more important environmental problems that influence negatively on our life, typical examples are air pollution and climate change. Unfortunately, the advances made in agriculture and industry, burning fuel, and smog discharged have pushed up CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. It is one of the main elements that cause human’ lung problems and the greenhouse effect. Typically, people living in Beijing, China have to against numerous amounts of toxic fogs daily morning. This led to half of million people die or become lung problem victims every year. Moreover, climate changes are the main factors for the melting ice phenomenon at the north and south poles, causing huge figures of floods and human extinction risk in the future.
Personally, I strongly claim that the excessive development in modern life has been causing unbelievable numbers of environmental problems, and all of them are elements of negative effects on human life’s quality. Thus, humans in general and government, in particular, need to create more appropriate solutions to minimize the amount of CO2 concentration and rehabilitate the ecosystem.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 95
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Parallel to the enhance in agricultural and industrial activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (China) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ically, people living in Beijing, China have to against numerous amounts of toxic fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, in general, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66472303207 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09183639105 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626822157434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2553026895 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.294117647 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260603851953 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807336008776 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108915348595 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165058809699 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121893291873 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Parallel to the enhance in agricultural and industrial activiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (China) must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ically, people living in Beijing, China have to against numerous amounts of toxic fo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, in general, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66472303207 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09183639105 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626822157434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2553026895 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.294117647 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260603851953 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807336008776 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108915348595 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165058809699 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121893291873 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.