Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
There is a statement that several firms value employees who have good appearance by dressing smartly, while some people claim that other organizations prefer employees' work achievement than their looking. I am partly agree with this statement. I personally believe that employees should either have good looking or productivity at work.
The first impression is one of the most crucial factors to attract other people's attention. Therefore, it means good-looking people definitely have more advantages than people who do not prior to their appearance. For example, in a meeting where two employees have to present about their business projects to the investors, one of these two people dresses up professionally with vest and leather shoes, while the other one wears comfortable clothes and sneakers. As a result, people will be more impressed with the first person who dresses smartly and suitable with the business context than the person who has casual looking, because the business meeting requires formal clothes and the first person can show the well preparation through the appearance. Hence, the investors will pay more attention to the professional-looking person's presentation.
Moreover, as you have good appearance, it obviously that you will be more confident about yourself. It is the fact that self-confidence is a key value to be successful. Thus, there is no doubt to say that if you desire to be success at work and get achievement as well as recognition, you should take care of yourself and invest into your appearance to boost your self-confidence, it may be helpful to have valuable performance at workplace.
In conclusion, it is neccessary to have the professional appearance at work as well as good performance at the organizations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write 73
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...evement than their looking. I am partly agree with this statement. I personally belie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31071428571 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18417443566 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.81801452 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.916666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13534672166 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495891565648 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500143387671 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856422654183 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435467903826 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.