Summarize the points made in the lecture.
Altruism is a behaviour type where the living being prioritize others to themselves.While the reading passage suggests some examples and the findings from it,the lecture proposes the opposing conclusion from the findings.
The reading passage points out a specific species of animals, meerkats and their altruistic behaviour by stating that one of the meerkats acts as a sentinel , protecting other meerkats who either hunt for food or eat food they have obtained by alarming them when it saw the predators nearby.Due to this, it goes without food while others eat.In contrast, the lecture posits that the sentinel eats beforehand and serves as the safeguard.
Furthermore, according to the passage the sentinel meerkat put itself in danger and the other meerkats escape as a group because of the alarm and the sentinel has to flee alone.But the lecture points out that the other meerkats are in danger because , even though the predators are attracted by the sentinel signals, their awareness turn to the group of meerkats which are escaping together or moving apart thereby putting them in danger.
The passage suggests that human by donating their organs to relatives or third person exhibits altruistic behaviour. But the lecture points out that the donor enjoys the appreciation received which is considered as self-worth, thus non considerable reward is valuable to some people, which in turn leads to non-altruism in them.
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 70
- Altruism 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...g being prioritize others to themselves.While the reading passage suggests some examp...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...s some examples and the findings from it,the lecture proposes the opposing conclusio...
^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t one of the meerkats acts as a sentinel , protecting other meerkats who either hu...
^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...g them when it saw the predators nearby.Due to this, it goes without food while oth...
^^^
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
..., it goes without food while others eat.In contrast, the lecture posits that the s...
^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...larm and the sentinel has to flee alone.But the lecture points out that the other m...
^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the other meerkats are in danger because , even though the predators are attracted...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, third, thus, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27631578947 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74368496431 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 21.2450331126 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.877788709 49.2860985944 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 240.6 110.228320801 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.6 21.698381199 210% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.8 7.06452816374 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111775265662 0.272083759551 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598135241624 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360271276665 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700559270185 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147628305859 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.2 13.3589403974 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.8541721854 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.0289183223 189% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.7273730684 247% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.498013245 191% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.