The line graph below compares the data of umployed work force in the USA and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
Overall, the unemplyment rate was higher in Japan,compared to the US. However,the proporion of workforce in Japan rose steadily between March 1993 and March 1999, while the figure for America fell.
Initially, the US reported the highest percentage of jobless people with 7 whereas, japan were at the lowest by 2.5, in 1993. However, with some minor fluctuations, Japan experienced a gradual increase in 1998 and recorded the highest rates of umployement by 5.5. On the other hand, the proportion of jobless workforce in the US fell gradually and recored 5 in 1998.
Although, Japan started with the very low rates but the country tookover the USA and remained at 5 in 1999. In contrast, the USA started with highest percentage but it decreased over the period gradually, fell down and experienced the lowest number by 5, same as japan, in 1999.
- Some people belive that comanies should manufacture products that last for a long time Other feel that the emphasis shoul be laced on producing goods that are cheap Discus both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some people belive that comanies should manufacture products that last for a long time Other feel that the emphasis shoul be laced on producing goods that are cheap Discus both views and give your own opinion 73
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 89
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares the data of umployed wor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , compared
...the unemplyment rate was higher in Japan,compared to the US. However,the proporion of wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...her in Japan,compared to the US. However,the proporion of workforce in Japan rose st...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...5 in 1999. In contrast, the USA started with highest percentage but it decreased over the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6903721527 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5169197762 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410394526707 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196844091336 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130429746051 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277246454798 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149241018946 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.