Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? people should stop reading and listening to the news for a period of days and weeks
It is tempting to think that whether people should stop reading or listening to the news for a few days or few weeks. For this idea, every expert could have different opinions. However, for me, it is impossible for individuals stop reading and listening news for a long time, because many people rely on reading and listening to the news to make new friends and reading the news is responsibility for a country’s citizens.
To begin with, people who do not like reading and listening to the news usually feel very hard to make new friends and keep friendship with their old friends. This is because they do not have a common topic to talk about. For instance, Lucy, one of my classmates, have said that the news is the most boring thing in the world. In this case, only when he has required to read or listen to the news will he read or listen. Otherwise, he will never read or watch them. However, he barely has few friends, and he never makes new friend in three middle years. It may be hard to believe that he does not have many friends, because of hating to read or listen news. However, it is he hating to watch or read news that he usually does not have some common topics with others. Therefore, when others are talking about recent news, he will feel struggle and boring, so he chooses to quit the conversation. Gradually, he loses some of his friends and stops making new friends. Obviously, stopping to read or watch news for few weeks can bring such bad influence for making friends and keep old friends, so people should not stop to read and watch news.
Additionally, it is responsibility for each citizen watching and reading new constantly, because everyone has obligations to know what happens to their countries and the world. For example, currently, global warming is a really serious problem to the whole world, if people do not know how serious it is, they will continue to choose using somethings that are very unfriendly to our environment, like burning woods. In this case, for a long time, our earth will be like the predictions in the news, many cities nearby the ocean will disappear. On the contrary, if everyone has the habit that watches and reads new every day, they may know that our earth is suffering serious people, they will not do somethings that hurt our earth! In this case, it is obvious to think that it is abnormal to stop people to read and listen to the news.
In conclusion, people should not stop reading and listening to the news, because of the two reasons mentioned before
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | Bingdong Li | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | Bingdong Li | 78 | view |
- do you think shopping in a small store is better than in a supermarket 76
- teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 73
- no 3
- do you agree or disagree with this statement the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens 73
- the most important problems will be solved during our lives time 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...ous it is, they will continue to choose using somethings that are very unfriendly to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause of the two reasons mentioned before
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60619469027 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43882791279 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41592920354 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.886034401 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.578947368 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7894736842 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348134562121 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128627691298 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1039610976 0.0737576698707 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262063674395 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743527755036 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.