do you agree or disagree with the statement: students should be required to study basic science to graduate.
This is a common thing that many universities have been requiring students to take some basic science courses, even though these basic science courses totally do not have any relation with students’ major. In this case, should universities command students to take these courses? In my opinion, students should not be required by universities to take these basic courses which are unrelated to their majors.
First of all, requiring students to take these basic science courses might lead these universities to lose a lot of applicants. This is because fewer students will avoid these schools when they are applying to universities. According to research, shows that most students who plan to study art in universities usually are pretty poor in science courses, such as, chemistry, biology. Therefore, most of them express that they are extremely afraid of failing in the science courses in the universities, so they will search for information on the internet or ask seniors of some universities before they apply to schools, if they get the information that this college or that college needs them to take science courses to graduate, they will avoid this kind of school when they are applying. From this research, it is obvious that requiring students to take science courses will lose a lot of students.
Secondly, hardly do students who study in other majors get benefits from taking basic science courses. As my uncle experience as an example, my uncle used to study management in Zhengzhou University several years ago. However, the graduation requirements showed him that he needed to study 12 credits of basic science courses before he graduated. In this case, he had to take several biology courses and physics courses before he graduated. However, today my uncle is a manager in a local hotel, so he claimed that it is true that he might use massive knowledge from management courses, he never used knowledge from these science courses, such as gas law, force law for his work. From my uncle's experience, this is easy to know that requiring students who study different majors with science will help them nothing.
In conclusion, not only requiring students to take science courses will lead schools to lose a lot of students, but also will provide nothing benefits for students after they graduate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | Bingdong Li | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement people should stop reading and listening to the news for a period of days and weeks 60
- Do you think honesty is the most important characteristic for a leader 73
- do you agree or disagree with the statement that should students take the course taught in a traditional way that teachers speak and student listen or the course that student discuss and talk 70
- people prefer to cook food by themselves or eat at cafeteria 70
- teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10236220472 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65681888013 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456692913386 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.1111450146 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.6 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2535685369 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117447567124 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783458061959 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173840406777 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064238692929 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.