A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Applying to colleges is a huge step for students and it is weighed heavily on high school GPAs, personal statements, letters of recommendation, and SAT scores. The given prompt suggests that all the students of a particular nation should have to study the same curriculum until they enter college. I personally strongly agree with the given prompt for the following two reasons.
Having the same curriculum up until high school gives all the students a fair chance of being admitted to a particular college. For example, if there is a school that covers all the subjects on a surface level, their students will tend to get higher scores in their classes as compared to students who go to schools that cover subjects meticulously. Thus, the difference in the curriculums of the two schools will be responsible for the divergent high school GPAs of the students. Since college applications weigh school GPAs heavily in the admission process, the chances of the students from the school that does not go in-depth with the subjects will be given higher preference given their higher GPA. Because of this, certain students will be prioritized over others who might have the same or higher level of smartness.
If all the students entering a specific college come in with the same knowledge, it will give the professors of the college a better idea of what the students already know and where the professor needs to start from. If the students coming into college have discrepancies in the material that they have studied in high school, the professors are obliged to go over all the material from the basics so that none of the students feel lost. This is beneficial for the students who have not learned the material in high school, however, for the students that have learned it previously, time that could have been spent learning new things is being wasted on repetition.
Some might argue that repetition does not harm, in fact, it helps the students jog their memories. Although this is true, students that have recently learned the material in college do not require a revision since it is fresh in their memory. Given the reasons above, it would be beneficial for the students and for the professors at colleges if the curriculum was standardized till the students enter college.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 33
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather a 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'school'.
Suggestion: school
...asses as compared to students who go to schools that cover subjects meticulously. Thus,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94300518135 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62542495304 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453367875648 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9341498384 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.285714286 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290557348594 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121209192284 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130648134433 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199759918195 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736743781398 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.