The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country. Do the advantages outweigh this advantage?
With globalization accelerating at a rapid pace, there have been growing calls to have only one global government, which would motivate countries to unify towards resources and international policies. To the best of my knowledge, the drawbacks of this growing trend outstrip the benefits.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that there are many member nations abusing their power to serve their own interests rather than those of the entire world. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, the growing trend of global collaboration is accompanied by the increasing intertwined conflict among countries all over the world. Furthermore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that establishing a global government has resulted in reducing cultural diversities and identities. As a result, this phenomenon can affect international relations about economics and politics.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by opponents to this is that this policy could encourage member countries to collectively contribute to solve common problems. According to researches, a global government would be able to act faster in solving issues effectively because they would have more resources at their disposal. For instance, a single government could better protect residents by enacting strict laws that force all citizens to get vaccinated against Covid-19. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that due to different traditional and cultural perspectives, it could lead to inconsistent measures in tackling issues of each country. Furthermore, it can take a long time and high budget to build a unified global system in all fields.
In conclusion, a single government for the entire planet could help resolve global issues but would limit the distinctiveness of each individual nation as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | maiphuong0610 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 73
- The chart below gives information about the high speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 74
- The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009 89
- Many animals are endangered Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows changes in water levels of reservoirs in 6 cities in Australia between 2009 and 2010 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50684931507 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12027462211 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599315068493 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4160589727 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.692307692 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220596583949 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670169609068 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383619211926 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131761590298 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154431928577 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.