the graph show the percentage of total music sales by mothod
The line graph illustrates the proportion of three platforms of music sales over a period of 8 years, namely streams, downloads, and CDs purchased.
In general, what stood out from the graph was that there was a significant increase in the percentage of sales through streams platform. In the meantime, the figure for downloads and CDs purchased experienced the opposite trends.
The proportion of total sales in streams platform was lowest for the first time in 2011, at approximately 5% in total. Over the 8 following years, it is clear to see that the figure for streams experienced a significant incline, a jump of more than 35%.
In the others, until 2014, the percentage of downloads sales increased slightly to over 40% while the figure for CDs purchased experienced a dramatic downward of 17%. By 2018, the proportion of CDs purchased sales in total continued to fall, dropping to 25%, whereas figures for downloads sales also declined significantly to 30%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The bar ch t below shows the percentage of adults using the Internet in different age groups in UK during 2003 to 2006 61
- Some people say the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed Discuss about both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period 73
- some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution however others think there are some other ways 61
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06875 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90575264562 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9395497204 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223292579554 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106189511391 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710168114859 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140857283177 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232704127529 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.