In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct
In the modern-day, duty plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance work's yield. A controversial question that deserves some words here is whether or not people should work quickly with the risk of making mistakes or try to do their jobs as accurately as possible even if it takes more time. I assert that doing jobs slow but accurate is more beneficial than working at a high pace. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor to take into account is that doing duties with lower risks can save time. To shed more light on this matter, time is a valuable and worthwhile item in the modern era; therefore, individuals must sufficiently use their time. People should evaluate the work's risks for having high results: hence, assessing duties and reducing the risk of them may take time, but it increases the yield of works and reduces waste of total time. Consider an engineer who wants to design a chemical process, for instance. In this situation, before he starts the duty, if he evaluates all aspects of a project, such as all materials, references, dates, and many other items, he would reduce happens of risks by collecting and gathering all dates and materials he needs. Therefore, he can design his sites in a short time. On the other hand, if he only wants to start his job without assessing all aspects of work, he would failed several times, or he finishes the work with high risks. Because of it, he has some mistakes that would not shows until the procedure is completed, so he needs several times for solving errors or risks.
Another equally significant point is that doing duties with lower risks would save money. To elaborate on my point, most works and jobs need to high range of financial supports for doing them; moreover, they need to have high-quality equipment and facilities, such as high-speed computers, a lot of labor forces, high technology equipment for finishing. Thus, people must pay a lot of money for purchasing these items. If individuals who must handle the projects do not evaluate all parts of projects, they may become filers and make several financial damages to the companies by losing equipment or labor forces because in a large number of jobs the first mistake is the last one.
Taking all aforementioned reasons and examples into account, we may draw the conclusion that doing work with lower risks and speed has several positive points. I believe that people can both save time and money by evaluating their duties and reducing their risks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...estion that deserves some words here is whether or not people should work quickly with the ris...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 933, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'fail'
Suggestion: fail
...assessing all aspects of work, he would failed several times, or he finishes the work ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 625, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ng equipment or labor forces because in a large number of jobs the first mistake is the last one....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87858719647 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57367500854 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525386313466 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3265339049 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.315789474 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161378451892 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516213656396 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610657724803 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11157372509 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655822007791 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.