People in the community can buy cheaper products today. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is argued that these days, many people tend to consume more and more lower-cost products. However, personally, I believe that the following essay will analyze the pros and cons of this popular phenomenon.
To begin with, there are various benefits related to this situation. Firstly, it is no doubt that using cheaper products can help customers to save more money, especially during the current pandemic. Additionally, people who are in financial difficulty are likely to use goods at lower prices or suit their pockets. Therefore, cheaper goods always be a wise choice for all people, especially for college students who just have a certain amount of finance. Secondly, due to today's modern society, there would be an increase in living standards. This can leads to the variety of goods and lower-cost products always become the number one choice for the whole community. As a result, these kinds of economical goods will prove their strengths to respond to the rising demands of the market and each individual.
On the other hand, this problem is not totally free from drawbacks. The main reason for this issue is that the qualities of economical goods can not reach the expectation of all consumers. This is because the low qualities of cheap products are able to have a negative impact on human life. Also, because a lot of people that they just pay attention to these cheap goods and ignore the value and qualities of products, it can risk cause diseases such as food poisoning or even cancer. Furthermore, it cannot deny the fact that there is the existence of the habits of reckless spending because consumers just focus on the quantity and the joy of shopping
In conclusion, it is worth pointing out that this trend contains within it both merits and drawbacks but it seems that disadvantages may far outweigh its advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 51
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castellon in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparations where relevant 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be always
...their pockets. Therefore, cheaper goods always be a wise choice for all people, especiall...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 553, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... increase in living standards. This can leads to the variety of goods and lower-cost ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on the quantity and the joy of shopping In conclusion, it is worth pointing out ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94838709677 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61147710982 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593548387097 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9960752347 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143975681967 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422925562402 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351068070628 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738929062399 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316431488118 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.