School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is suggested that foreign languages should not be learned as compulsory subjects at schools. From my opinion, I totally disagree with this viewpoint due to a myriad of benefits that can be brought in by studing a new language
On the one hand, languages contain more than just vocabularies and grammars, they can open pupils’ minds by their uniqueness like culture or history, which can never be found in their own country. Apart from communication, studying a language also allows children to discover more about the world, broadens their horizon and forms them a more holistic viewpoint. For example, by learning English, students gain deeper insights into American life, specifically the way they communicate or the food they eat
On the other hand, being acknowledged about more than only one language is of paramount importance in this globalized world. Because information is written in different languages, so knowing more than one language can assist students a lot in their research as well as their daily lives. In a long term, this could be significantly helpful when it comes to occupation, because the world is increasingly globalized, the need for people who can speak many languages would be higher. Therefore, the more languages you know, the higher your job opportunity is
To conclude, although many people may not advocate the idea of teaching foreign languages at schoolds. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with that not only because of massive advantages can be gained through a language but also the possibility of failing behind if children are not taught any language
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | Valentinka | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | phuonganh0810 | 89 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 87
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- Road accidents are more frequent these days and claim many lives each year As a result some people suggest that drivers should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single driving test to improve the situation What do you think 73
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be brought in by studing a new language On the one hand, languages contain more ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, you know, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19923371648 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85876650165 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616858237548 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2879930881 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.625 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.125 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175059414027 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906808501952 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502940552649 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123998430694 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517837241198 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.