The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.
The table provides information about the change in the number of five types of fast food consumed in Melbourne from 2005 to 2025. Looking from an overall perspective, it is clear that the biggest change in the amount of processed food eaten will be salad, and a small rise will be experienced by fried rice and noodles.
In the first reported year, 5 units of salad were consumed in Melbourne, tripled in the present day, and will increase to more than 8 times higher in 2025. In contrast, both fried rice and noodles figures show small changes in the period. Similar to that of fried rice, the number of noodle units eaten in 2005 was 6, and the figure for fried rice and noodles in the present day then incline to 9 and 8 units respectively. Finally, in 2025, the figure for these kinds of fast food will be 9 units each.
Hamburger was the largest amount of fast-food consumed the first reported year, then it decreased by 2 units and in 2025, and it is predicted that the figure will rise to 51 units. In 2005, the number of fried chickens consumed was 35 units, increasing to 37 in the present day and the number will be 45 units in 2025.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-22 | thaotanya | 84 | view |
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other type of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42452830189 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3374343083 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466981132075 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7208484686 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164537003898 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089806296457 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907934854537 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136591142846 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670967370628 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.