Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.
Over the past several decades, there is a drastic increase in career options for students. The prompt suggests that students should be encouraged to study the field in which they can have a profitable career. I mostly agree with this prompt for two reasons. However, I do concede that there are a few exceptional cases.
To begin with, every student should be persuaded to choose field of study that will help them in a successful career because it will drastically decrease the confusion that students have during making decision related to their career. In the world full of opportunities, it is very difficult to choose a path that will lead to achievement and triumph. Students are in the early stage of their life and do not have the required expertise and experience to forsee which route of career will be best for them. This confusion, in return, results in bad choices of career.
Secondly, the success of young citizen will also flourish the economy of the country. The market of trending careers is highly volatile. A job which is growing rapidly today, might be outdated a few decades later. Therefore it is important to choose a career wisely. If educational institutions guide students to study the field which will still be available in the future, it will not only help the students to grow and excel in their life but it will also contribute significantly in the economy of the country.
However, there are a few exceptional career paths for which cannot predict the profitability. For example, if a student wants to become a musician then, this approach of encouraging students to study lucrative career will certainly will not include music. It is possible that if we ignore the proposed approach and students are rather encouraged to study any field of their choice and interest then might become a great musician in the future. But students choosing such career paths are considerably less.
In conclusion, the claim given in the prompt that educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers, will not only help the students find a better way in their future but it will also help the country to thrive and flourish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | wopona8219 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | wopona8219 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | PranaviN | 50 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | shashank__hegde | 33 | view |
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans generally 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 54
- The best way to teach is to praise positive action and ignore negative ones 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...y student should be persuaded to choose field of study that will help them in a succe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... might be outdated a few decades later. Therefore it is important to choose a career wise...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96533333333 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66170738854 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4778399332 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.444444444 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.58673353495 0.243740707755 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162116301983 0.0831039109588 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144926778822 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349048581142 0.150359130593 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126404989782 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.