Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
I think that the sedentary lifestyle of the modern world has been impacting humans since the inception of technology. Sustainability of resources has now become a prime focus of most of the scientists to assuage the harm caused by the current lifestyle of humans to our planet. I agree with the statement that our future generations will suffer because of our present way of living. I will explore three reasons for my stance in the following essay.
To begin with, the industrial revolution helped us in mass production of goods. We started consuming these materials, however, we became complacent because the labour required to do a particular task reduced drastically. The information techonology revolution was another hammer stroke on our world which made us even more smug leaving us in a world where we cannot even have any body movement. For example, I went to play with my friends on the cricket ground everyday in my childhood. But, children today are sitting in their rooms all day long and play video games with their friends on the internet. The physical and mental development of kids happens in the real world and not a virtual reality.
Internet is a platform with enormous power. It can help us buy our goods without stepping outside of our homes. E-commerce such as Amazon, Ebay, Alibaba are the companies which deliver goods at our doorstep can now be seen as we are locked in our houses. The technological applications are great, but we have forgotten that we do have a real world. Our next generation will not have any idea of what it means to go to a shop and buy the mundane stuff. For example, my cousin aged four has not seen her mother going out to get food and clothes. When I ask her, “lets go to buy some milk products”, she would bring the mobile phone of her mother, rather than getting ready to go out.
Finally, we have become overdependent on the technology, that if it collapses one day, then we are not ready to tackle the consequences of the crash. Our bodies have now evolved to sit all day long at the same place. It is costing our health and therefore, we can imagine how it could affect the next generations who will never know what suffering and efforts look like. For example, the next generation would be weak, they won’t be able to resist any physical exertion.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that our bad style of living will affect our next generations in a way that we will regret. This is because of lesser physical and mental development of kids, sedentary lifestyle where kids would have never experienced the outside world and where children will be physically weak.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | ishitakush.08 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | GRACE_047 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-28 | rassata | 73 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 80
- Playing games together is a good way to build closer relationships 70
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 53
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 70
- Plastic bags are terrible for the environment They should be banned everywhere 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...us in a world where we cannot even have any body movement. For example, I went to play w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...y with my friends on the cricket ground everyday in my childhood. But, children today ar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73695652174 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63760341898 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534782608696 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8952433141 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7391304348 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266691442457 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738945611095 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875666394783 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164270395562 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828884435511 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.