the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000. summarize the information by selecting, reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates three types of Hollywood film in a studio with respect to the percentage of income over period between 1970 and 2000.
Overall, the figure for revenue earned by comedies was relatively stable through the years. It was also noticeable that those of romance and action along with horror altered contrary to each other, which were decreased and increased correspondingly.
In 1970, comedies made up for 33% of total revenue. During the next decade, the proportion of income from this genre witnessed an extremely minimal growth, resulting in 3% higher than that was at first. There was a slight fall coming up next, keeping its profit remained stably at about 30% from 1990 to 2000.
At the beginning, romance genre stood at the highest point, accounting for about a half of total profit created. At 4 times fewer, those of action and horror types stayed at the lowest position. Up to 1990, after experiencing a gradual increase, action-packed and horror overtook the rank of comedies. It was followed by a significant rise up to 47% in 2000 and became the highest of all three. On the contrary, the percentage of comedies went down and took the lowest place of 9% as action-packed and horror was at 1970.
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 96
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
- Some people think the main purpose of schools is to turn people into good citizens and workers rather than benefit them as individuals To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f total revenue. During the next decade, the proportion of income from this genre...
^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the lowest position. Up to 1990, after experiencing a gradual increase, action-...
^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by a significant rise up to 47% in 2000 and became the highest of all three. On ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, on the contrary, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9043062201 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67998114546 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612440191388 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1308441401 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210546633232 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813842390215 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338749083076 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129975682314 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223164705949 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.