The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007.
Write a report describing the information below.
The line graph shows change in the percentage of cars used within household in Great Britain during the period between 1971 and 2007.
Overall, the number of households that owned one car along with three and above cars virtually stayed remained through the years. There were extremely slight increases inserting into stable state expressed through change of families who possessed more than two cars. The two most remarkable upward and downward tendency belonged respectively to two cars owners and no cars owners.
The year 1971 witnesses half a British households didn't use car, which was the highest number at that time. Standing at about 44%, families that own one car was a little fewer. During three next decades, its proportion stabilized approximately around this point. There was a noticeable gap between one car owners and two cars ones expressed in nearly four times fewer amount of two cars used per household. The bigger numbers of cars was the most unpopular. With only 3% and a rise up to 7% in 2007, having possession of more than two cars hadn't been familiar to citizens.
Since the end of 1970s, the percentage of two cars owners started to climb up. From 10% at that time, the period onwards observed a sharply growth resulted in staying at 26 % in 2007, equal to half of some of one cars and three or above cars within households. It became the second common type for the British after that of one car, which had still remained in 1971. Changing in an opposed way, in comparison with mentioned trend, the percentage of no car household fell dramatically. In 2007, there was a point at 25%, nearly a half fewer than it was at the beginning. As a result, the top position in 1971 replaced by third one after 36 years.
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 89
- the graph below shows the proportion of revenue for three films types romance comedies action horror for a Hollywood studio from 1970s to 2000 summarize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar graph shows a comparison of the figures for tropical deforestation for the year 1990 and 2000 The pie chart indicates the causes of tropical deforestation during the period from 2000 to 2005 96
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percentage of cars used within household in Great Britain during the period betwe...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le upward and downward tendency belonged respectively to two cars owners and no c...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'household'?
Suggestion: household
... The year 1971 witnesses half a British households didnt use car, which was the highest nu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...971 witnesses half a British households didnt use car, which was the highest number a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...having possession of more than two cars hadnt been familiar to citizens. Since th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
... that time, the period onwards observed a sharply growth resulted in staying at 26 % in 2007, eq...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an opposed way" with adverb for "opposed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ch had still remained in 1971. Changing in an opposed way, in comparison with mentioned trend, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s at the beginning. As a result, the top position in 1971 replaced by third one a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, still, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 303.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77227722772 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45442354629 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.217946765 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3125 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142840388931 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553103040715 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371752109028 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109187051756 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373270268059 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.