The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The charts show how yearly expenditure by a particular school in the UK changedin 3 various years.
Overall, the share of teachers’ salaries was always the highest of the 5 different categories. In contrast, insurance accounted for the lowest percentage of the total school spending over the period shown.
In 1981, 40% of total expenditure by a particular school went to teachers’ salaries while the proportion of other workers’ salaries was 28%. Over the next 10 years, the rate of salaries of teachers slightly increased to 50%, about twice as much as that of other workers’ salaries, at 22%. In the year 2001, the figure for teachers’ salaries and other staff’s salaries followed a similar pattern, decreasing by 5% and 7%, respectively.
Turning to the remaining categories, resources and furniture and equipment constituted the same percentages, at 15% in 1981. 20 years later, the proportion of resources experienced a marginal rise to 20% then fell by 11%. In the meantime, this period showed a dramatic fluctuation in that of furniture and equipment, ranging between 5% and about 20%. Meanwhile, initiating at 2%, the rate of insurance considerably went up to 8% at the end of the period after increasing slowly by 1% in 1991.
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06852956682 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9582919151 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147942490233 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595500810819 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073243327909 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108865408615 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846296679239 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.