International student enrolment in British universities 2009-2014
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of international students studying in ten British universities in two different years, 2009 and 2014. Overall, it can be seen that after 5 years, every university saw roses in the number of international student enrollment, except Liverpool which remained stable and a decrease in Cardiff university.
To begin, foreign students accounted for 8% of Birmingham university in 2009 before jumping significantly to 12% in 5 years later. A marked increase was also seen in Edingbourogh university, of which only 3% were international students in 2009, that number went up twice higher in 2014. Although the percentage of Brighton university minimally climbed from 12% to 13%, it remained the highest number of foreign student enrollment among ten universities.
On the contrary, there were no changes in the number of Liverpool’s international students, which stayed stable at 8% throughout the period. Interestingly, Cardiff university lost attention from foreigners, declining from 2% to 1% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 56
- The percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
- The average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 11
- the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008 73
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50920245399 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30144583206 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.892421599 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416326921808 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1781635962 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119797942963 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259103880545 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131629205411 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.