Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention in school. What are the reasons? What could be done to solve this problem?
It is true that numerous students are having a hard time concentrating on studying at school. While there are several reasons concerning this problem, some measures can be implemented to resolve this issue.
One prominent reason is that there are plenty of distractions at school and one of them is mobile phones. To be specific, when using mobile phones is acceptable in classrooms, it is likely that students have the tempts to open their phones. In fact, funny videos and gossip about the private lives of celebrities may sometimes be much more appealing than lessons at school. Another reason can be teachers’ mistakes. From time to time, the lectures made by teachers are not interesting enough to catch the attention of the students. In addition, some knowledge is too hard for students to comprehend, but teachers don’t give their best efforts to make it clear for the students. Therefore, students decide to switch off.
There are solutions that would be effective in combating this problem. Firstly, schools should restrict the use of mobile phones at school. For example, students can use their smartphones during their break time, but when they are studying, these electronic devices can only be used if permitted. Secondly, teachers should try their best to convey the knowledge clearly and easily for the students to understand. They can make lessons fascinating by creating some interactive activities such as team discussions or games.
In conclusion, although smart devices and disinteresting lectures can result in difficulty with paying attention at school, effective steps can be taken to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-04 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | ngo viet | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Nguyen Hai Dang | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | ngango56 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 67
- Task 1 The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include examples fr 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28352490421 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78424138994 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8908373562 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20743991748 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770659973666 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489686048211 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149029999636 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444856353133 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28352490421 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78424138994 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8908373562 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20743991748 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770659973666 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489686048211 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149029999636 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444856353133 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.