Internet users as percentage of population
The line chart gives information about the number of population who used Internet in three different countries the USA, Canada and Mexico in during period of time from 1999 to 2009. Overall, what stands out from the chart is that there were upward trends in the number of Internet users in the USA, Canada and Mexico. In addition, the data of Canada increased dramatically versus USA and Mexico. In 1999, Internet was less popular in three countries, the proportion of people who used Internet were lower than 20 percent per each. From 2003 to 2007, Internet started developing in the USA and Canada, the number of people who used/utilized Internet rose significantly. Meanwhile, the figures for Mexico still grew slightly. Over the two-year period, in Canada, Internet was used strongly and reached the highest point to roughly 100 percent. When it came to the USA and Mexico, the rate of users Internet went up remarkably, especially the data of Mexico did not reach to 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- The graph below show the proportion of the population aged 54 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three differents countries 78
- The graph below show the average onumber of UK communters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2020 73
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 78
- Internet users as percentage of population 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...es the USA, Canada and Mexico in during period of time from 1999 to 2009. Overall, what stands...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92121212121 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.556009861 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7948281012 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216804485669 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943188749285 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591244118782 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216804485669 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.