Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether people should work for the same workplace for their whole career or for a variety of companies. Although there are some advantages to working in the same organisations, I would argue that changing working environments is usually more productive.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that working for the same companies has several benefits. To begin with, those sticking with one job in the long term can be familiar with their tasks as well as the working environment, which would help them to be under less pressure. Consequently, they could easily achieve a work-life balance and spend more of their time on their personal hobbies, such as: strengthening their family bonds. In addition, working for the same organisations for a long time would allow workers to accumulate experiences and necessary skills, which would lead to their greater promotion prospects. This could help them to get a more generous high salary package and gain their job satisfaction.
On the other hand, there are numerous reasons why changing a career path is more effective for many employees. Firstly, some people’s personalities are not suitable for remaining working for a long period of time as they want to challenge themselves, which means that they need to change their companies to try new job opportunities. For example, my sister always wants to change her job to have more invigorating experiences and alleviate boredom at old work. Secondly, working in different environments would help them gain vast knowledge about numerous fields, which could enable people to be better under pressure and adapt for any cases. It is the key factor for their successful career path that you cannot achieve when you work for one organisation for a period of time.
In conclusion, while working for the same companies all their working life can benefit under certain circumstances, I am of the opinion that experience for different workplaces is the better choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | lethithuphuong | 87 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | huyenphuong1702 | 78 | view |
- The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are On the other hand it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erous reasons why changing a career path is more effective for many employees. Fi...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...itable for remaining working for a long period of time as they want to challenge themselves, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sister always wants to change her job to have more invigorating experiences and a...
^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e people to be better under pressure and adapt for any cases. It is the key facto...
^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hen you work for one organisation for a period of time. In conclusion, while working for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.173374613 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84073568922 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532507739938 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9627344338 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452679899453 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185857643627 0.084324248473 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102575216343 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336181001193 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598610773821 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.