The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now.
The pictures illustrate how a cinema’s arrangement has developed from 1980 until now.
As can be seen from the maps, the cinema has been equipped with more facilities and movie rooms.
In particular, there were only 2 big cinema rooms in 1980. However, the one in the left corner of the cinema was knocked down to make space for a relaxation room and food and beverages section. This cinema 1 is relocated in front of the restroom, which has always been in the upper left side of the cinema. Meanwhile, the previous area for drinks next to the ticket bar in the right of the entry is replaced by a DVD shop.
Meanwhile, cinema 2 shrunk down in size and was renamed cinema 4, with the erection of a small cinema 5 in the same right side of the main room. Moreover, two different movie watching areas are constructed in place of a long car park at the back of the cinema, a small cinema 2 behind the toilet and a bigger one at the upper right corner.
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- In some countries young people have become richer healther and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'shrunk' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'shrinks'.
Suggestion: shrinks
... by a DVD shop. Meanwhile, cinema 2 shrunk down in size and was renamed cinema 4, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: down
...VD shop. Meanwhile, cinema 2 shrunk down in size and was renamed cinema 4, with the erec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40449438202 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38805680441 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3992187421 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38831441596 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177114381141 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108906652301 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236207310736 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090718083657 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.