Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s world, visiting historical spots is getting ubiquitous and becoming a trend for the citizens, including going to the museums. However, there has been a protracted debate whether the visitors should be charged entrance fee. From my point of view, I am of the opinion that the pros are more significant than the cons.
Admittedly, charging people for museum entrance can bring disincentives to their visiting. As not everyone is intrigued with going into the museum, the free ticket will encourage them to pay a visit and the love for historical things can grow on them after that. However, if people see the price they have to pay, they will be more likely to go to other different places rather than the museum. In the long run, the museum will gradually lose its place in the city and the values of history or tradition will soon go into blur.
Nevertheless, there are a myriad of charging people when they come to the museums. The first thing to notice is that it will provide finance for the preservation and management of the infrastructures and artefacts in the museums. As the money required for maintenance and running this place can be astronomical, the fee from visitors can put the financial strains off the museum’s budget, thus fostering better quality of the site. Moreover, the tourists can have a better understanding and appreciation of the value of museums if they pay the money. If going to the museum is free of charge, people will pour into it without any consideration and it will lead to disarray. By contrast, when the money is taken, people will spend quality time to enjoy the work of art, the artefacts and the like. As a result, they will put more emphasis on the meaning of the museum.
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of charging the museum entrance fee, I am convinced that the advantages are more vital as it supports the museum budget for the preservation and underpin people’s awareness of the value of the museum itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...nto blur. Nevertheless, there are a myriad of charging people when they come to th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83090379009 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71315029817 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.655429911 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260213042594 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095756834152 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747293742679 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180466728434 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748159888128 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.