The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017
The bar graph illustrates the number of visitors to a certain Caribbean Island over a seven-year period between 2010 and 2017.
Overall, there was an increase in the total number of tourists to the Island. By the year 2017, the number of those staying on cruise ships was higher than those staying on the Island.
In 2010, the number of visitors who stayed on the Island was the higher one out of the two options, at about 750,000 tourists. This number remained static in 2011 after which there was a steady increase to the peak of 1.5 million visitors in 2013. From 2013 to 2015, the population plateaued with a slight depression in 2016, then rose back to the peak value in 2017.
On the other hand, the number of people who stayed on cruise ships had an initial fluctuation from 2010 to 2013 between 250,000 and 500,000. However, from 2013, the number rose steadily over time surpassing those who stayed on Island in 2016 to reach the peak of 2 million tourists in 2017. In addition, the total number of holidaymakers on the Island had a steady increase from 1 million in 2010 to 3.5 million in 2017.
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Pl 70
- With growing populations in cities more and more people live in homes with little or no outdoor space Do you think this is a positive or negative development 80
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60301507538 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35059886354 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467336683417 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5049851178 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295106673731 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143706737108 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898530913422 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217359421909 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891518487262 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.