The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The chart illustrates changes over the period of ten years in trends among young adults of using devices to watch television in Canada.
Overall, drastic reduction of conventional TV usage can be seen in a decade from 34% to 4%. While, a considerable rise was recorded in flat screen TV from 15% to 26% which elucidates that people moved on to a better version of TV to enhance their experience of watching. Also, both desktop computer and laptop saw substantial depletion (around a third for both).
A subtle rise can be noticed in application of portable devices like tablet and mobiles among younger people in 2019. The use of mobile phones almost doubled in the year 2019 (26%) from 15% in 2009 whereas, the utilization of tablets increased four times than it was in 2009 (5% to 19%).
In conclusion, the TV viewing habits in Canada over the period saw a move away from older devices and towards more modern equivalents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-12 | jenny_nguyen | 82 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | mrinal | 79 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Amna Zeeshan | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | Quoc Dat | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | tajindersaini786 | 78 | view |
- The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects to everyone Do you agree or disagree 95
- Studying the English language in an English speaking country is the best but not the only way to learn language Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 92
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 56
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker someone you work closely with Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are import 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can be seen in a decade from 34% to 4%. While, a considerable rise was recorded in fl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, third, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78881987578 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61917445826 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658385093168 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4889031312 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11283216841 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530635260772 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657779781925 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082864885508 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073467968459 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.