In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Dear Teachers and Friends, please kindly take a look at my writing task II essay below. I would appreciate all your comments.
It is argued that to improve traffic issues, governments ought to impose high taxes on people owning private automobiles and use that money to upgrade public transportation facilities. This essay will demonstrate how this solution can mitigate pollution but will also show the drawback it places on car owners.
The most evident advantage when taxing personal cars heavily and investing more in mass transit is that the number of private automobiles may be significantly reduced. In order to save money, people will intend to switch to more economical options like carpooling and public transportation. Not only will the intention relieve traffic congestion but also help improve air quality. When less cars are used, the amount of toxic emissions will surely decrease and the carbon footprint will be limited. This has a positive effect on the environment since carbon dioxide is one of the main causes for global warming and climate change.
On the other hand, there is an obvious disadvantage to such a solution. In many rural areas, people do not have access to public transportation and it can cause many inconveniences to commuters. In order to go to school or work, they will have to either walk or drive their own vehicles. When taxes are increased, people have no choice but to spend more money. Moreover, the countryside usually has a lower living standard compared to urban centers, therefore, heavy taxes will place a financial burden on them.
In conclusion, even though high taxes on personal automobiles benefit the environment, they can also result in difficulties for people living in the countryside.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 78
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 61
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 78
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...but also help improve air quality. When less cars are used, the amount of toxic emis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19771863118 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85152851127 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3698987608 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.153846154 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181581809461 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629980439324 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584653247283 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106198840217 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602655022321 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.