The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014.
The pie charts illustrates the proportion of volunteers by six different arragement in the year of 2008 and 2014.
Overall, what stands out form the graphs is that volunteers's participation in environment, sports and health care significantly increased, while the opposite was true for art, education and others. Additionally, health care was the least popular during 2 years.
Looking at the details, as regard the figures for volunteers in 2008, volunteering in academic association was top of the list with 24%, just ahead of environmental association with 21%. Moreover, the percentage of volunteer participating in art was 18%, as opposed to 15% from sports and others. Whereas, the contribution of people do volunteer work in health care was nowhere near as much as other types of arrangement with only 7%.
Furthermore, the year of 2014 witnessed a sharp improvement in the number of people volunteering in natural and sports organisations, 29% and 25% repectively. Art came next at 12%, although this was considerably less common than tutoring at 17%. This was followed by other kinds of volunteering organsation with 9%, making it slightly more well-known than health care at just 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...8 and 2014. Overall, what stands out form the graphs is that volunteerss particip...
^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... opposed to 15% from sports and others. Whereas, the contribution of people do voluntee...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29842931937 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19882005877 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6413256273 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166971104333 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772348508104 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832223763079 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123273464491 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101156821077 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.