The citizen of Forsythe have more beautiful life
People in Forsythe have adopted a healthier lifestyle, according to the supplied rationale This allegation is supported by three facts, according to the narrator. One significant detail that emerged from a recent poll is that residents' eating habits now more closely match the government's dietary approaches than they did a decade ago. Sales of food products with a cholesterol-lowering ingredient called "kiran" have risen at an exponential rate. There has been a decrease in sales of sulia, which is a food product that healthy individuals do not consume on a regular basis. In spite of all of the information offered, the argument fails to persuade the reader that Forsythe citizens have adopted a healthy lifestyle.
Lacking information about the survey that generated the first fact in assistance of this claim is important negligence in this argument's structure. It's impossible to trust the findings of the census's statistical analysis because the survey's procedure has been questioned. In the survey, no mention is made of who participated in it. Younger people are more probable than older ones to be health-conscious, therefore their eating habits are likely to be numerous from those of 10 years ago. In this scenario, the numbers cannot be applied to the entire population of Forsythe, and hence the conclusion of the argument is invalid. Forsythe residents' lifestyles could have been represented in the results of the survey if the arguer had comprised more information about the demographics of those who participated in it.
: The arguer's second fact are insufficient to support their assertion. As a result, the argument fails to show a direct correlation between healthier lives and the rise in sales of kiran products or the decline in sales of sulia products. Forsythe residents may be purchasing food products containing kiran in extremely little doses, which does little to assist them lead healthy lifestyles. Even if the food product is actually junk food, it may include elements of kiran, which is a known carcinogen. In other words, these foods are harmful to the health of Forsythe inhabitants. Sulia's nutritional value is not mentioned in the text. Sulia may have a high nutritional quantity, yet healthy citizens may not choose to eat it due of its flavor or some other reason.
: Thirdly, due to poor manufacturing of the food product, even if sulia is considered an unhealthy meal, it is possible that sales of the food product are dropping because of this. As a result of adopting healthier lifestyles, it isn't required that the citizens have voluntarily quit purchasing Sulia. As a result, the argument fails to show a relation between the sales of these food items and the strong lifestyles of Forsythe residents.
: In sum, To make an assumption that eating habits in Forsyth are more in line with government dietary approaches than they were 10 years ago is unreliable if there is no evidence that the poll was conducted among persons who reflect the entire population. Healthy people steer clear of sulia because of the lack of proof that it is harmful to their health. With this background, the argument presented is utterly unpersuasive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-13 | Anish Sapkota | 59 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | laneem12 | 65 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | Victory | 54 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | swetha_14r | 55 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | sisampandey | 68 | view |
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 519 350
No. of Characters: 2608 1500
No. of Different Words: 248 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.773 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.025 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.891 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 189 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 153 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 112 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 72 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.901 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.351 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.062 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 601, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...consume on a regular basis. In spite of all of the information offered, the argument fails...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'surveys'' or 'survey's'?
Suggestion: surveys'; survey's
...ensuss statistical analysis because the surveys procedure has been questioned. In the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'junked'.
Suggestion: junked
...s. Even if the food product is actually junk food, it may include elements of kiran,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...lt of adopting healthier lifestyles, it isnt required that the citizens have volunta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2669.0 2260.96107784 118% => OK
No of words: 518.0 441.139720559 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15250965251 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99775373555 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 204.123752495 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492277992278 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 845.1 705.55239521 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4898492951 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.208333333 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167233657549 0.218282227539 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468862890148 0.0743258471296 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585278694506 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998311864286 0.128457276422 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402094096308 0.0628817314937 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 98.500998004 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.