Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The continuous emergence of the rapid crime volume requires immediate intervention from the law enforcement and technology applications are regarded as an effective measure to diminish criminality. Personally, I completely agree that innovation could contribute tremendously to crime prevention in general.
On the one hand, there are critics on the basis that criminality is the result of hereditary traits or environmental factors which is inevitable and the statistics will insist at a certain degree. In terms of those whose parents have committed heinous crimes in the past or whose characteristics are often aggressive, there is a likelihood that their offspring could inherit partially an individuality of impulse or violence. Hence, as the preconception and cognition system of children in formative years do not allow them to draw a clear distinction of good and bad while growing in such conditions, they would blindly duplicate the wrongdoings of the adults. Consequently, there will be a gradual increasing number of juvenile delinquencies in turn.
On the other hand, I believe that the aforementioned issue could be surmounted as technology is able to outperform the conventional crime prevention methods with applications in a larger context. For one, the installation of camera systems in several countries has emphasized its efficiency when penetrating every single corner of the streets. The execution of this setting has delivered tangible results given the incidence of crime often occurs under squalid conditions or even in the residential areas. Drugs dealers, for instance, have been caught with a massive number of cases under the supervision of undercover cameras. Furthermore, with cutting-edge gadgets, federal agencies are now available to track suspects movement of the offenders in tandem with minimize the crime volume, which will support the process of investigation substantially.
To conclude, innovation could facilitate law enforcement in the endeavor to reduce the proportion of crime. Yet, governments should adopt technology in accordance with the privacy of citizens for the sake of the society as a whole.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
2023-05-30 | jay1451 | 78 | view |
2022-01-30 | sonnn | 89 | view |
2022-01-04 | sonnguyen | 89 | view |
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and giv 89
- Tomorrow is the most important thing in our life However some people think that the present time is more important How important is it for individuals and the country to think and do something for the future What is your own opinion 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always good Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Many doctors recommend that older people exercise regularly but most patients do not follow an exercise routine Why do you think this happens How can people be encouraged to exercise regularly 89
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ously to crime prevention in general. On the one hand, there are critics on th...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of juvenile delinquencies in turn. On the other hand, I believe that the af...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rocess of investigation substantially. To conclude, innovation could facilitate...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or the sake of the society as a whole.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, so, while, for instance, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64615384615 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27141320819 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621538461538 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1316309496 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.153846154 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181469215092 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593717318504 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469363001084 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10876166273 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389896218813 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.