Many people believe that lecture halls have been replaced by online learning. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In this contemporary epok, majority of individuals deem that lecture halls have been changed by online learnings. I entirely disagree with this rubric. Because, lecture halls are more beneficial than online learning viz strong bond with friends and there is no distraction in lecture halls.
Commencing with this statement, there are several merits of doing study in lecture halls. First and foremost, it can lead strong bond with peers. To be more precise, if pupils do online study thus they go to university. Due to this, bond with friends become weak. However, attending lectures in lecture hall is not only assist to strong bond but also aid to develop different types of ideas. Student may discuss the topics with their friends in lecture hall. Due to which, they become easily understand the topics. Therefore, the knowledge of pupil becomes vast because of discussion on different topics on their regular basis.
Moreover, in online lectures, pupils may distract from their studies. To elucidate, students do online study on mobile phones or laptops with aid of internet. Sometimes, they may distract from different types of notifications, due to this they got less marks in exams. To epitome, in India, in pandemic situation, all schools were shut down and students study via online classes and around 70% of students got minimum marks in the final exams. Students do not have any option for their career if they may got fail in exams. So that, lecture halls are more better for providing education to pupils.
To recapitulate, this notion have several merits of lectures halls would not replaced such as strong bonding with friends, enhance knowledge and more concentration on studies without distraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-27 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-11 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-03 | Paralmani | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | Shivam patel | 89 | view |
- The chart and graph below gives information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began
- Many people believe that lecture halls have been replaced by online learning To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment Only government and large companies can make a difference What extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 11
- More and more people prefer to buy readymade food from restaurants or convience stories instead of cooking for themselves What are advantages and disadvantages of this 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... of notifications, due to this they got less marks in exams. To epitome, in India, i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd students study via online classes and around 70% of students got minimum marks...
^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...il in exams. So that, lecture halls are more better for providing education to pupils. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...eral merits of lectures halls would not replaced such as strong bonding with friends, en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57193871835 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2723386777 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201351791586 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691812335483 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059015629369 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144584801454 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631328807888 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun marks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... of notifications, due to this they got less marks in exams. To epitome, in India, i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd students study via online classes and around 70% of students got minimum marks...
^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...il in exams. So that, lecture halls are more better for providing education to pupils. To...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'replace'
Suggestion: replace
...eral merits of lectures halls would not replaced such as strong bonding with friends, en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16129032258 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57193871835 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2723386777 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201351791586 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691812335483 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059015629369 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144584801454 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631328807888 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.