In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
Due to the effects of urbanization, cities are now surrounded by suburbs, and these districts often feature a gigantic mall or shopping center. The concentration of products and merchandise in one location turns these retail outlets into attractive and fascinating destinations for consumers, thus increasing the need for transportations, especially cars. Although there are many benefits of these all-in-one areas, the existence of some noteworthy drawbacks calls for consideration of the issue.
Starting with positive aspects, it is apparent that an enormous mall offers a lot more choices for their customers, giving them great convenience. Moreover, large chain stores populating the shopping centers generally provide inexpensive prices, as a result of economies of scale. Furthermore, as cities spread out, a considerable amount of people reside in suburban zones that are closer to large malls than traditional stores situated in the city center.
Nevertheless, there are some highly unwished-for effects of this matter. In the first place, huge stores and malls are operated by megacorporations that run small shop owners out of business, while not returning so much to the local community. Another reason is the fact that as people are encouraged to drive more, this increases traffic congestion, individuals’ carbon footprint, and contributes to air pollution, while also making it obligatory to construct more roads, which worsens the problem by a lot. One more concern can be seen as citizens without private vehicles might get discontent, as they have much fewer options and be forced to buy whatever is near to them (Choosing to use public transportations in order to reach the shopping centers can raise their frustration due to the overcrowding that is caused by the growing number of personal automobiles).
Overall, while occupying everything in one location is undeniably convenient and favorable, the great harm to local communities can be clearly seen. With that being the case, the benefits of large stores are outweighed by the social and environmental damage they cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- The best way to solve world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- Some people think th t the detailed description of crimes on newspapers and TV had bad consequence so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Discuss the pros and cons for children of watching television 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50308641975 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11828458454 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626543209877 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8290311937 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.583333333 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156250530911 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533126090227 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473166764674 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854387110379 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548287566211 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.