The plans illustrate a number of changes which took place in a beachfront area in Australia between 1950 and the present.
Overall, the beach front area has witnessed radical changes with the most noticeable being the erection of a road connecting the city and the beach. In addition, there are more recreational facilities compared to the past.
In 1950, the road linking the city with the beach headed to the car park in the north east. Along with the road, there were a playground, dining tables and a pavilion. In front of the beach, there were two 125m pools, one was next to the light house, the other was on the opposite side.
After 7 decades, the road is extended longer to the south east corner of the map. Additionally, there is an extra one car park in the west, which is a replacement of the old playground. Moreover, there are constructions of a restaurant and two surf clubs to meet the increasing demand. Besides, the old pool 25m in the west was replaced by a bigger 50m pool.
- The charts below show local government expenditure in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 89
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 78
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 87
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60335195531 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58542754045 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.7126548493 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684501062307 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0260078102428 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451620053912 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.05334705073 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572273548704 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.