More and more people are seriously overweight. Some people suggest the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The downside of modernization and convenience is the increase in unhealthy lifestyles and poor eating habits. That can cause a variety of health issue he s. Some people suggest that the government should raise the tax on fattening foods in order to address these concerns. However, I disagree with this proposal.
Nowadays, the number of people who are overweight or even obese is on the rise. One of the reasons is supposed to derive from the fattening foods that are commonly known as “fast food,” such as French fries, soft drinks, and hamburgers. Besides, these foods are inexpensive and simple to obtain. They are also well-liked by a large number of people. These temptations make them unable to stop buying. As a result, they gain weight. However, the crucial reason for weight problems is unhealthy lifestyles. For example, people tend to spend numerous hours sitting when they use computers or smartphones for work or recreation, which can lead to a sedentary lifestyle. This will facilitate fat accumulation in their bodies. This is a source of different weight-related ailments, such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity. If they have fast food with a reasonable portion combined with regular exercise, diseases related to weight will be decreased. Furthermore, educating people about a healthy diet and lifestyle through the media or in schools can help to reduce weight problems effectively. With the provided information, people will be aware of the pros and cons of the problem and can choose the best way to deal with it.
Admittedly, increasing taxes on fattening foods can have a certain effect on the buying rate. However, the fast-food industry contributes a large proportion to the revenue and employment of a country. If this industry declines in production, the government may face various negative consequences.
In conclusion, the most effective way to limit weight problems is through a positive lifestyle and a proper perspective on dieting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Ngoc21 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | duyenn | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | duyenn | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | minh phương phạm hồng | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the Information by selecting end reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some claim that studying abroad has greater benefits for a student s home country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 70
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
...styles and poor eating habits. That can cause a variety of health issue he s. Some pe...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... to obtain. They are also well-liked by a large number of people. These temptations make them una...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25471698113 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92662567654 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3524685381 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5714285714 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198105220668 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530852903798 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483039597179 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113096872561 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595406885977 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.