The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present.
The two illustrations give information on changes of Ryemouth's village from 1995 to present.
In general, the village of Ryemouth has experienced modernisation with addition of fishing port in the sea. Moreover, a forest park has been removed from its territory.
In the north-western part, more houses have been situated near the road than in 1995 and shops which was placed near the sea has been replaced by restaurant. Then, in the south-western side of the village, at the expense of the six fish markets,four apartments have been built next to the sea. After that, a fishing port has been added in the sea.
Turning to the eastern part, the golf area has been constructed with tennis court extensively in the place of farmland and trees have been removed from there. Subsequently, hotel which is located in the south-eastern side, has remained unchanged. However, car park has been added nearby.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Lily Ha | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | anaiseishere | 11 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day 61
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 61
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , four
..., at the expense of the six fish markets,four apartments have been built next to the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02666666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87978394251 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5204843094 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7777777778 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904334521958 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471007928527 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087047505332 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942722502224 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106225047005 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.