The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate various changes that were made to Happy Valley Shopping between the years 1982 and 2012.
It is apparent that the main modifications were made to the in-house facilities. These involved the rearrangement of stores, new parking facilities, and new furniture retail.
Looking at the maps in more detail, we can see that in 1982, the coffee shop was in the north corner of Happy Valley Shopping Center but it was demolished in 2012 to make room for a sports center. Furthermore, the food store was relocated to the south-east corner and themed restaurants were built next to it, replacing a row of shops.
The two maps also showed changes that were made to the outdoor area. There was a lake on the east side of the shopping center in 1982. However, this was no longer present in 2012 and instead, we see the addition of furniture retail. Moreover, this shopping center was assessed via a pathway from the west side of it but then this pathway was demolished and a parking lot was constructed instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
- The chart below shows changes in the number of international students in Australia in 2019 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79775280899 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60407651445 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1452514789 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161594304594 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745170934538 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744765778975 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114604136249 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759075732789 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.