The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The given graph describes how many visitors went to Caribbean Island over the course of 8 years, starting from 2010.
Overall, it is readily obvious that the total number of tourists witnessed an upward trend throughout the period. It is also apparent that staying on cruise ships was more welcomed than on island in the last 2 years of the surveyed period while the reverse was true in the previous years.
In 2010, there were 1 million people visiting Caribbean. This figure increased significantly from its original number to 3.5 million 8 years later. A roughly similar trend was seen in the number of visitors staying on the cruise ships, where it started at around 0.25 million at the beginning, followed by a slight drop in 2012 before going up steadily to 2 million for the rest of the time frame.
About 0.75 million visitors stayed on island in 2010. This number remained stable in 1 year and then reached the peak of 1.5 million in 2013. After that, there was generally unchanged in the volume of people except for a small decline in 2016.
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 74
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 80
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 61
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71195652174 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35535603087 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4194013755 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179378641278 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085100445843 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705780256156 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111461303622 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388789696321 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.