The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010.
The given diagram describes the construction intention of the medical center in 2008 and 2010.
In general, it was evident that the area witnessed dramatic changes in just two years.
According to the diagram, in 2008, the main entrance was opened in the waiting room. In the waiting room, there were the staff office and the reception. In addition, the right of the main entrance was the way leading to the laboratory. It was necessary to pass through the waiting room to go to the corridor, which connected other function rooms such as the treatment room and doctor’s offices. In this period, the medical center had three offices for doctors.
In 2010, after being reconstructed, there were various improvements made in the medical center. The project was expanded with the education room and the mother and child room on the left of the waiting room. Moreover, the pharmacy was built at the end of the corridor and on the right. There was a door from laboratory to the pharmacy created. The doctor’s offices were reconstructed from three to four rooms in the same area compared to 2008. The medical center was expanded, with the storeroom located opposite the pharmacy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- TASK 2 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The table below shows the result of surveys in 2005 2010 and 2015 about McGill University Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree of disagree 67
- Task 2 In many countries today people buy a range of household goods TV microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Task 1 The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, in addition, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95979899497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60265611308 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9441980779 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.9230769231 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203331678958 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909941956337 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131611506226 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176770321318 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.17452848771 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.