Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Educational institutions play a great role in shaping children's future so they should support students who wants to pursue their field of interest no matter what.
Interfering in student's choices might cause them to doubt themselves and loose their confidence. As a result of which dissuading a student to not take up their field of interest even though they are not very good at it might just end up exacerbating the situation. Children's learning ability and grasping power is higher than grown ups. With the right motivation and determination a child can try to excel in their field of study.
Educational institutions tests the ability of the student through theoretical tests. There might be chances of students excelling in a particular field practically even after failing the theoretical tests. Let us assume that a student is performing bad in business studies. That doesnt mean that the student lacks the ability to succeed in business field. The student might be street smart and possess skills and tactics which is required for successful business. So, just considering that the student is incapable of suceeding in chosen field based on institution's evaluation is absurd.
Also, every field of study has broad classifications and different streams. Institution's syllabus might just include a fraction of it. If a student doesnt perform well now, we cannot assume that he is going to fail in pursuing his interests. Consider Computer Science field, it has various streams computer architechture, programming, data analysis, artificial intelligence. Institution might not have included all these streams in the syllabus. Student who performs bad in computer architechture might excel in programming.
Although, children are prone to make mistake in choosing the field with wrong intentions. Students might choose the field for wrong reasons like - his/her peers are choosing that field, there is a lot of scope in that particular field, career opportunities in taht field is very high. These might lead the student to make wrong choices even though they are not really interested in it. Dissuading students in this case might help students to consider all the options and make a right choice at th earliest.
Therefore, there are both pros and cons for what the author has stated. Educational institutions must take great care in understanding student's motive and interest before doing the necessities. Taking a quick judgement based on scores and conventional methods of testing is inappropriate. Students should be encouraged to improve and excel in their field of interest.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ight cause them to doubt themselves and loose their confidence. As a result of which ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...erforming bad in business studies. That doesnt mean that the student lacks the ability...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ent is incapable of suceeding in chosen field based on institutions evaluation is abs...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 554, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...e of suceeding in chosen field based on institutions evaluation is absurd. Also, every f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 149, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... include a fraction of it. If a student doesnt perform well now, we cannot assume that...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...techture might excel in programming. Although, children are prone to make mistake in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s must take great care in understanding students motive and interest before doing the ne...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, really, so, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33902439024 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94278793473 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529268292683 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3376903819 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.56 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191346286364 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560535230269 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350000109612 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106028781478 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027864796468 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.