Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in
which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your
reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you
should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how
these consequences shape your position.
In everyone' s life, there are numerous moments where a decision lays the path of one' s future. The first moment for most is choosing the field to study, it is of utmost importance that the right decision is taken. While it is true that educational institutions can help guide students on which field will be the best fit on the other hand it would be wrong to just stop them from pursuing the field of their choice, the final say should always be of the student. This essay projects my thoughts on this subject.
The role of an educational institute is to shape the minds and personalities of the young minds under their umbrella, in this process the institute is always on the suggestion side of the decisions and not the deciding factor, especially when the decision will affect the student' s life. While deciding the choice of study, the institute can help students to make themselves aware of the implications of each choice, however, the final say should be of the student only. Instead of restricting them, certain prerequisites can be placed for each field of study so that whoever chooses to pursue the field will get a taste of it before they actually enter the course.
While it is true that if no one is present to object to the choices a novice mind makes, the implications might be too harsh. The view that the institute helps the student save time and effort when they trim the choice to a limited set of fields that might be perfect for the student but at the same time they are taking away the decision-making power of the student and deciding based on statistics which can't be trusted all the time. The student might not be interested in that field anymore, or one might want to change the field just because they got the idea that the recommended field may not work. Always the better option is to lend help so that the student can gain the required knowledge for the field they want to pursue.
To sum it up, educational institutes can only place certain pre-requisites for each field to study to make sure that someone without prior knowledge of what they are going to face does not make a wrong choice but they can't pursue anyone to leave their interest and choose something else just based on statistics.
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 50
- Some people think that we learn best through in person interaction with a teacher in a classroom Others believe that online learning is more effective Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below provides details about the ownership of electrical appliances and the number of hours spent on housework for the period of 1920 to 2019 78
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... and deciding based on statistics which cant be trusted all the time. The student mi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...hat the recommended field may not work. Always the better option is to lend help so th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e does not make a wrong choice but they cant pursue anyone to leave their interest a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, so, while, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46807617386 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4725 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.0409952874 60.3974514979 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207190306228 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772821016651 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557131302315 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13695202776 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171058644767 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.