Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whereas some students prefer to work alone on projects assigned by their teachers, I prefer working with a group of students. In this following essay, I will further explore my reasons to base my stance.
Firstly, working together provides more ideas from different students. The collaboration of many students together leads to brainstorming. Thus, out-of-the-box revolutionary ideas come to the light. Apple- the famous technology company- is a compelling example of this concept. Steve Jobs was an ambitious student who dropped out of college and started his own company. He included other smart young people in his company. As a result of working together with his young team, he made a leapfrog and created the company’s first innovative personal computer at the time. This computer- Apple 1- has no monitor, keyboard, or mouse. If he didn’t collaborate with his peers, we wouldn’t have enjoyed the experience today.
In addition, working with a team keeps the students motivated specifically at times they feel less enthusiastic. In fact, working on a project could be harsh and exhausting sometimes. Some students find it challenging because they don’t have enough academic and practical background. However, working with other students keep their focus on the project. Take my personal experience as an example. When I was in dental school, I had to finish a project that is crucial for my graduation. Thus, I figured out the best way is to create a study team so we could help each other out with our projects. Accordingly, we kept each other motivated and exchanged information that helped a lot with my project. Luckily, I got a good grade for my project and for my collaboration with my peers.
To sum up, working with a team is beneficial to the students. They get exposed to different horizons and standpoints which help their own progress. Also, Knowledge exchange with other students keeps their attention on their projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 85
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp fishing boats When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe and they die Some people suggest that this p 81
- at universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 70
- In the united states employees typically work five days a week for eight hours however many employees want to work a four day week 73
- extended family are less important than in the past 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, whereas, in addition, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14465408805 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91572354177 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0971568419 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.1304347826 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8260869565 20.6045352989 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273704743826 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771949802345 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675711216454 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167791237011 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516412866899 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.