The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000.
The bar chart compares how many USA citizens lived alone in 5 various age groups from 1850 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of people living alone increased over the years in all age groups. The figures were witnessed the highest for people aged 55-64.
In 1850, it was not noticed for the data of the under 37 age group. The figures for people aged 37-46 and 47-54 were similar, at about 2.5%, while this rate was less than 3% at the age of 55-64. In 1900, the percentage of those aged 37-46 remained unchanged, while a slight increase was given for the 47-54 and 55-64 year-olds, compared to just over 2% for those in the 27-37 category.
Regarding the year 1950, nearly 2% of people living alone belonged to the 17-26 age group. Whereas the figures for those in the 55-64 year-olds rose dramatically to reach 9%, other age groups only grew slightly. In 2000, it can be seen that there was significant growth in the proportion of people living alone, with the percentage of the 55-64 year-olds nearly doubled to 17%, by followed by those aged 47-54 and 27-36, at 13% and 8% respectively. While 5% of the 17-26 age group lived alone, the figure was 7% for the 37-46 year-olds.
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Billions of US dollars 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 The US 9 7 10 5 13 5 18 22 7 EU countries 3 3 3 4 3 8 3 67
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 75
- Some people think that the world should have one government rather than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57407407407 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29520863578 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532407407407 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.203543941 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285233018509 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153795494588 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106117991238 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234223572653 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119537190281 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.