University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In the modern time, the presence of sexual equality in universities is uncommon. To support gender equality, many people argue that universities should admit the same number of males and females in every field. However, in my opinion, this idea is unrealistic due to undesirable long-term consequences that I will explore.
There is no doubt that, having the same number of male and female students in every study areas can lead to temporary equality. Nevertheless, in the long-term, this compulsory approach have many unexpected results. The first clear drawback should be negative effects on education quality because of different talents between men and women. For example, boys are more likely to be good at technology-related subjects while girls tend to perform well in literature-related fields. Many of students, who have no passion in their studying fields, could not achieve good points in these subjects. As a result, the quality of education would undoubtedly decrease.
The second downside of this idea would lead on the longer term to an increase of tuition fees. For instance, to get enough a number of female or male students, school must do more marketing activities. The more money they spent, the more revenue they must plan to receive. As a result, they might increase the tuition fees to compensate their loss.
Last but not least, balancing gender quantity in every class would contribute to inequality. For example, when accepting only half of girls or boys for one area, there will be many deserving students cannot find a position to study because of unreasonable rule. It will raise a question that how we can apply an unequal approach to deal with a problem related to equality.
Overall, in my opinion, the idea of admitting the same number of males and females in each field is problematic owning to unexpected impacts not only on school results, but also on societies regarding productivity and equality.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisions where relevant. 93
- The table below shows the changes in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 51
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 55
- The chart below give information about the way in which water was use in different countries in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant. 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 65
this compulsory approach have many unexpected results
this compulsory approach has many unexpected results
The first clear drawback should be negative effects
The first clear drawback should be the negative effects
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 317 350
No. of Characters: 1576 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.22 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.972 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.647 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.57 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.706 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5