Some people think the government should not spend on international aid because there are disadvantaged people in their country, such as the unemployed and homeless. Do you agree or disagree?
With the trend of globalization, some countries would like to provide international aid to those countries that are less developed. While some people are strongly against such behavior, it should be considered under different circumstances in my perspective.
On one hand, the reason why some countries or areas require assistance is due to the disadvantage there, such as unemployed citizens or homeless residents. These types of people are not only making no contribution to the development of their countries, but also taking benefits or daily supplies from the government, which is dragging the pace of development. Countries encountering such an problem should deal with it by themselves instead of relying on aid from other countries. For instance, when China was founded in 1949, it faced serious domestic problems such as poverty, undeveloped economy and lack of technologies. The Chinese government united people, worked together and finally tackled all these problems.
On the other hand, some countries or areas require international assistance because they have external issues, geographical limitations or uncontrollable factors, such as war, lack of resource and natural disasters. It is a great moral that people are willing to help each other, and so are countries. There no denying that it is not an obligation for one country to offer help to another, yet proper and friendly assistance may help another country to get rid of the difficulties, which is the spirit of humanity. Citing the horrible Indian Ocean Tsunami several years ago as an example, plenty of countries surrounding were severely devastated. Lots of countries from around the world spend decent amounts of fund to help those countries rebuild their homelands. Such international aid is extremely helpful and necessary.
In addition, helping each other is the correct way of cooperation between countries, as no country can guarantee they will always be strong and powerful. Countries that receive assistance would be grateful for countries that provide the help, and the receivers are definitely willing to offer help to helpers when they face their own problems in the future.
To conclude, whether a country should provide international aid to others has to be considered under different situations. The assistance should aim to help them go through tough time, but not to help them deal with problems that should be done by themselves.
- Some countries have spent a large amount of money on bicycles Why has this happened Is it the best way to solve traffic problems 79
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Some people like to spend their leisure time with their colleagues while others prefer to keep their private life separate from their work life Is it a good thing to spend leisure time with colleague 67
- In some countries older people who retire from work spend the money on themselves e g holiday rather than save money for their children Is this a positive or negative development 68
- Some people say that money is the best gift for teenagers Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...evelopment. Countries encountering such an problem should deal with it by themselv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38219895288 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99437078657 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.860663304 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.941176471 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278310646307 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093738247011 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541244571628 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161269817139 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663970161412 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.