It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that scientists can go to the far-off natural conditions, like the South Pole. From my perspective, this issue brings more restrictions than benefits.
First of all, despite expanding knowledge about far natural environments, it is undeniable that researchers can lose their lives through traveling to remote natural environments. In fact, their lifespan can be decreased by the dangers of those places if they are unlikely to prepare fully equipment and essential objects. For example, according to BBC News, there are fifty-five people who are lost their lives and missed distant natural surroundings in the South Pole in 2010.
Secondly, they may waste a lot of money going to the remote natural conditions, and they can exhaust through going on this journey. To be more specific, because they live far from far-off natural surroundings, they need to have much money and much time in order to move to those places. And they can be tired when arriving there because they have to sit in one seat on public transport for a long time. Researchers may be exhausted due to working there for a long period. Take my parents as an example, about 5 years ago, they took a trip to South Africa to discover lifestyle and weather conditions which are extremely useful to their reports, but after exploring this place about 30 minutes, they feel tired due to not preparing fully cuisine and equipment, but fortunately, my parents were supported by another group, so they could explore this destination in order to complete reports without worrying about lack of food and equipment.
To conclude, due to the numerous mentioned reasons, it is my belief that this problem has more disadvantages than advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In many countries government spent a large amount of money on improving internet access Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money 61
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey may waste a lot of money going to the remote natural conditions, and they can ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02693602694 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74382473598 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.428769848 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.727272727 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152042498715 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640933119001 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439272683511 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101287003229 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029036972172 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.