There are some cities not allowing foreign visitors to share the same cost of sightseeing cultural and historical attractions as the natives. From my perspective, I completely object to the idea that foreign and domestic tourists suppose to pay for different amounts to enter the same places of interest.
The reasons why I disagree with the regulation consist in several aspects. Initially, charging foreigners more money to view the sightseeing they are eager to pay a visit decreases their enthusiasm for this place. What is worse, the lack of enthusiasm does harm our connection with the outside world for such phenomenon disables individuals abroad wondering how our culture or history developed. For example, if the entrance money for the Great Wall were too high to afford, there would be no foreigners even getting the chance to learn the courage and intelligence of our ancestors. Moreover, it will form a sense of discrimination and unfairness to the foreign sightseers, which is likely to cost us more somewhere else shortly.
While there do have some advantages of rising the ticket fee for visitors abroad. For one thing, the local individuals usually are the ones who protect these cultural and historical attractions from natural catastrophes. It is like a kind of humanistic reward for them to pay less than foreigners. For another, as the cultural and historical attractions are indeed public facilities, guaranteeing the national citizens’ priority by charging the foreign visitors more should not be blamed for there is no deniable that the scenic spots of China are crowded everywhere. Taking Xihu as an example, imaging a Xihu with a sea of tourists, how could anyone be able to experience the beauty of nature?
Taking into account all these above, we can eventually conclude that we are not supposed to charge foreigners more for the historical and cultural attractions for the sake of the harmony of our descendants and the future development of our country.
- Some people think that in the modern world we have become more dependent on each other while others think that people are now more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- Some people think that foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...d. For one thing, the local individuals usually are the ones who protect these cultural and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17956656347 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90510716723 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9557064086 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359795279491 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118155048979 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638393694619 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204177847172 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061276286229 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...d. For one thing, the local individuals usually are the ones who protect these cultural and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17956656347 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90510716723 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9557064086 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359795279491 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118155048979 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638393694619 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204177847172 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061276286229 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.